OXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ethan Allen Interiors has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 6.73%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.09%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.46%. On the other hand Ethan Allen Interiors has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.08%. Given that Ethan Allen Interiors has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Ethan Allen Interiors is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.391%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Ethan Allen Interiors offers a yield of 5.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues of $142.7M. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $9.6M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Ethan Allen Interiors's PE ratio is 11.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.55x versus 1.07x for Ethan Allen Interiors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of -3528.43%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.46%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.55x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of --. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.46%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Northann.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.55x versus 1.71x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 2.12%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $51.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.46%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -11.78%. Given that Tesla has more downside risk than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.431, which suggesting that the stock is 43.075% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.00x while Tesla's PE ratio is 186.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.55x versus 12.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.